Importance of sanskrit

Published by Sudhanshu Saurabh Gupta on October 17, Sanskrit is that the oldest language in the world to be recorded. Importance of Sanskrit in fashionable education may be just another topic of discussion but it should be considered more seriously. The Sanskrit language is Indian in one sense, however, its purpose has been universal. Germany has already been a storehouse of Sanskrit scholars to the globe.

Importance of sanskrit

Its Importance to Language By Stephen Knapp There has always been a controversy regarding whether Sanskrit was the original language, as some feel, or whether there was what has been called a Proto-Indo-European PIE language that was the start of all other languages, which is now said to have disappeared.

So let us take a look at this. First of all let us face the fact that Sanskrit is the language that composes what has been recognized as the earliest texts on the planet, such as the Rig Veda and the other Vedas.

Secondly, it is also known that it was an oral tradition long before it became a written language. This was because the great sage Vysadeva, who compiled the main portions of the Vedic literature, could foretell that the memory of mankind would soon be greatly reduced, compared to what it had been.

So there would be a need for the texts to be in written form. Thirdly, the sophistication of the language, its grammar, syntax, and so on, was highly developed.

Importance of sanskrit

So it had to have been in existence for some time, long before most other languages, or even any other language that appeared later on, all of which were far less developed than Sanskrit. So, how could there have been a Proto-Indo-European PIE language that was the basis of forming Sanskrit that had to have been almost as sophisticated as Sanskrit that is said to no longer exist?

It all started when certain researchers started to see similarities between the main languages, such as Sanskrit, Importance of sanskrit and Latin. Presently, there are languages and dialects, of which half is considered belonging to the Indo-Aryan subbranch.

And most of the languages in India are known derivatives of Sanskrit. Then inFilippo Sassetti, an Italian merchant who had traveled to India, Importance of sanskrit wrote about various similarities.

He was the one who first proposed that they must all derive from a common source language, which he called Scythian. Then in the late s Gaston Coeurdoux made observations of the same type, with a study of Sanskrit, Latin and Greek.

There were others who had done the same thing. However, none of these men aroused much notice in their research. It was in when Sir William Jones started giving talks about the similarities between Sanskrit, Greek and Latin, along with Celtic, Gothic and Persian languages, and suggested that there was a relationship between them.

That is when people started to take notice. It was in when Thomas Young first coined the phrase "Indo-European" to describe this relationship and family of languages, which then became the standard "scientific" term. Then it was Franz Bopp who produced a study of these languages, called Comparative Grammar between andthat seemed to verify this relational theory.

This was the beginning of the Indo-European studies as part of an academic curriculum. From there it went further into what can be called modern Indo-European studies.

We could explain how various languages are considered part of a family or group and subgroups, or branches and subbranches, through genetic identification, or what can be called shared innovations, or their structure and phonology, or what is called their evolutionary history.

In any case, we now have the "Indo-European Family" of languages, which is a study of the commonalities of numerous languages, rather than the attempt to try to understand what was the original or "Proto-Indo-European" language, or the seed from which all other languages began, starting with Sanskrit, Greek and Latin.

So this is the difference when you begin talking about Indo-European language: Are you talking about the "family," in which case you could certainly be talking about many languages, or are you talking about what could be the original, or at least the search for the original seed language of all others?

In the latter case, such a language still has not yet been identified, and maybe never will. So if there was to be a Proto-Indo-European PIE language, which means the seed language of all others, it had to come from somewhere.

So where and what people developed it, and how did it spread? These were later called the Kurgan people, who lived northwest of the Caucasus and north of the Caspian Sea.

These were considered to be semi-nomadic people. The word kurgan actually means "barrow" or "artificial mound" in Turkic and Russian. The Kurgan hypothesis was first formulated in the s by Marija Gimbutas.

In any case, it was figured that these people abandoned their homeland and started to migrate in different directions, taking their language with them, some arriving in Greece by BCE, and others to India in BCE. From there, the languages started to morph into varieties into what we find today as Greek, Sanskrit and Latin.

This is known as the Kurgan Hypothesis, which basically means it is all speculation, or more diplomatically called a "model. It is then suggested that this PIE language faded away before there was the invention of a writing system, and then the Indo-Europeans expanded from the homeland, thus causing the evolution of the language into various dialects and incomprehensible daughter languages.

These languages also evolved, giving birth to each of their own family of languages. We also have the Anatolian Hypothesis. This theory, proposed by archaeologist Colin Renfrew at Cambridge University inholds that the Indo-European languages were spread not by marauding horsemen from the Caucuses but with the expansion of agriculture from Anatolia between and years ago.

Radiocarbon analysis of the earliest Neolithic sites across Europe provides a fairly detailed chronology of agricultural dispersal.The Sanskrit language is a rich source of vocabulary: Importance of Sanskrit language gets crystal clear as a source of vocabulary for the modern languages.

Sanskrit is able to provide on large-scale new technical terms which the modern languages are unable to search out for their own resources. The culture of Sanskrit and Sanskrit literature is actually the culture of synthesis and assimilation. The message of Sanskrit literature is one of humanism of unity of mankind, of values, of peace and mutual understanding and of harmonious development of the individual and the society.

Due to the influence of Jainism, Buddhism and Vedic culture which gives importance to Sanskrit, post 2nd Century A.D the history of Tamils are in sanskrit. But many stunnig things were exposed when Tamils began to study sanskrit.

Besides its importance to Hinduism, Sanskrit is also a philosophical language used in Jainism, Buddhism, and Sikhism. Jainism is a religion practiced by probably less than 1% of the population of India, and yet Jain literature has had a huge impact on Indian culture and history over the centuries.

Importance of Sanskrit In Modern Education on The Point Of View | Sanskrit is that the oldest language in the world to be recorded. Importance of Sanskrit in Sanskrit is .

An important use to which the Sanskrit language is put at present is as a source of vocabulary for the modern languages.

Sanskrit is able to provide on a large scale new technical terms which the modern languages are unable to find in their own resources.

Sanskrit - Wikipedia